I won't argue with the specs or bang for the buck, but I don't understand
the statement about Trylon and "8 ft. pipe". Maybe they've changed
something, but my Trylon did not have any "pipe" -- just 8 8-foot
sections, along with the 3 leg base (stubs) that go in the concrete.
My T600-64' is 64' tall -- or at least 62', accounting for overlap
where the sections join.
If I had it to do over again, I would be giving both Trylon an ANW
a serious look...
www.qsl.net/n0rq/ (includes a Tower Project of how my Trylon went up)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I've compared the specs. and prices of Trylon and AN Wireless towers (at
least the light-duty ones for each brand) and found the prices to be
similar for similar heights and wind loading. But when I consider that...
1. The advertised height of the Trylon includes the 8ft. pipe (supplied),
whereas the advertised height of the AN Wireless one is the height of the
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
TowerTalk mailing list