|To:||"Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"towertalk reflector" <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Conundrum|
|From:||Dave NØRQ <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:25:53 -0600|
Well, curious. The picture still shows 8 sections, 8 feet each, for a 64' tower.
I'm going to take a guess and suggest that perhaps Trylon decided to do something about the fact that their 64' tower is really only about 62' (due to overlap where sections join) -- and they now throw in an inexpensive mast. I would call that a change probably required by their legal dept.
Bottom line is that even not counting the "pipe", their towers are *almost* as tall as their model#/specs say. They still remain a very reasonable choice, competition from the worthy ANW line notwithstanding.
73, Dave NØRQ
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <email@example.com>
Tower height shown is nominal. Actual tower height achieved utilizing support pipe provided with tower."
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|