|To:||"K8RI on Tower Talk" <email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>, "'towertalk'" <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day|
|From:||Jim Lux <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:09:39 -0800|
At 04:13 PM 1/20/2005, K8RI on Tower Talk wrote:|
At 12:18 PM 1/20/2005, Keith Dutson wrote:To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a safety grounding system with SPG,
I think the RF safety issue might be more of a problem with VHF and UHF rigs. There's that picture in QST last year with the whip antenna on the picnic table next to the operator, for instance.
There have also been people who run 4-squares at field day (that one had a picture on their website with plastic net fencing around the antennas for RF safety).
Since the typical field day station will have more than 1 transmitter operating simultaneously. I don't think the typical field day setup is going to fall into what the FCC calls "categorically exempt from routine station evaluation". The "safe harbor" values in OET65B page 3 probably assume single transmitter at a time. If you're running 100W on 10 or 15, you'd also have to do an evaluation.
Another example is whether contesting operation can legitimately apply the 20% duty factor for "Conversational SSB" in Table 2, Page 14. (Especially if you fall asleep with your finger on the parrot <grin>)
Another antenna that might need some analysis (since it's not in the OET65B list) would be an inverted V for 80/75. At FD, you might have the vertex/feed up at 40 feet but the ends of the dipole (where the E field is highest) might only be 10 feet off the ground.
So... the analysis for any of these antennas might be trivial, but you still have to do it, and you have to have the "artifact" to show that you did. It might just be a worksheet in the back of OET65B or piece of paper with the (trivial) analysis on it (worst casing from the tables in OET65B, for instance), documenting the assumptions on duty factor and power. If you spend more than 15 minutes on it, it's probably overkill.
Actually, though, I think electrical safety is more of an issue at field day than RF safety. The comment about RF safety was more that just because you're at field day doesn't relieve you of all the usual safety rules.
By the way, as far as the assumption of field day running 100W goes (or even 5W), it's rumored that some big FD ops use a "specially calibrated" power meter.
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] re GROUNDING OF FIELD DAY STATIONS, Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)|
|Next by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, R. Kevin Stover|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, K8RI on Tower Talk|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, K8RI on Tower Talk|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|