|To:||<firstname.lastname@example.org>, "'towertalk'" <email@example.com>,"Jim Lux" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day|
|From:||"K8RI on Tower Talk" <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:15:39 -0500|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Lux" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "'towertalk'" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day
At 04:13 PM 1/20/2005, K8RI on Tower Talk wrote:<snip>
When you can safely get within a few feet of a 75 or 40 meter dipole running a KW safely and you might be running a tribander at 30 feet with a 100 watts it's going to be pretty difficult to exceed any RF safety limits.
Agreed, but even with whips and 50 watts you can get very close.
Remember the calculation is done for *average* power, not peak and takes into account duty cycle.
The DUTY FACTOR for CW is 40%, SSB phone 20%, FM, RTTY, and AM 100%, but
The evaluation can be done well before setup. You can work the calculations backwards but substituting in values. If you know you are running 100 watts out (or any particular power) through 100 feet of coax, you can figure in the gain of the antenna and the height and come up with the safe distance. I would think it would be the uncontrolled environment which is based on the average over 6 minutes. For contest operation this is going to be around 50% unless some one calls CQ for 6 minutes at a time. There are those who do.<:-)) But for safety's sake (your's doing the calculations) figure 100%. It isn't going to make a big difference at FD power levels.
Use the power calculator at http://n5xu.ae.utexas.edu/rfsafety/ or download the program.
I'm using the following as expamples. Every one should do their own calculations. BTW, you can subtract line loss as the calculations are based on power into the antenna or array.
Let's say I'm running 100 watts at 100% to a 4 element beam which gives 8dbd gain. on 10 meters. That's 10.2 dbi and calculates out to 33.93 feet for the uncontrolled environment. But it's SSB which is only 20% and figuring the operator is really long winded give them 100% instead of 50% for the 6 minute average. That comes out to 15.2 feet for the uncontrolled environment. Put the beam at 22 feet and the public could stand under it.
With CW at 40% it's 21.48 feet so you'd need the beam to be a tad less than 30 feet for the general public. For hams? It'd only be 9.63 feet.
Two meters is really the worst case scenereo. On 147 MHz with a 100 watt CW signal and 12 dbi gain the distances are 11.84 and 26.41 feet.
OK so what about the whip in the center of the table. Give it 3 dbi for a 5/8 whip and 50 watts continuous the calcs are 4.73 and 10.51 feet. Certainly not a good thing. Drop it to 50% duty cycle and it becomes 3.36 and 7.45 feet. You might want to put the whip on a post to be legal.
What about 75 meters? how about 1.58 and 3.48 feet respectively. Unless you drape the thing over someones shoulders it shouldn't be a problem.
For most contesters you bet. You figure the additional factor based on the 6 minute average. So if they are realy long winded give then 100% for that, which still leaves them with the 20% for SSB. Even a good loud snore would qualify for the 20%. OTOH a steady tone would not. Typically a good contester is not going to be transmitting more than receiving. That would be a minimum of 50%, so you have 20% for SSB and 50% for duty cycle which results in a factor of only 10% for the RF calculation.
However it should become evident that whether they are given 50% or 100 % for duty cycle it will make little difference in the distances.
See the above figures. You can get close enough to spit on the thing and still be safe.
Just do the calculations before ever setting up. You have the sheets and as long as the distances are greater than the minimums you are OK.
If the antennas are far enough apart they don't bother each other they should also be safe even combined.
did. It might just be a worksheet in the back of OET65B or piece of paper with the (trivial) analysis on it (worst casing from the tables in OET65B, for instance), documenting the assumptions on duty factor and power. If you spend more than 15 minutes on it, it's probably overkill.It should be something on every ones minds, but I really think that the RF safety is probably so over blown (no one knows for sure what levels are safe) that even the whip in the center of the table is plenty safe.
I set mine to impress. People wonder how I can get so much power out of a couple of transistors and a 12 volt supply drawing 20 amps which the 756 Pro does at 100 out on CW.
Roger Halstead (K8RI, EN73 & ARRL Life Member) N833R, World's Oldest Debonair (S# CD-2) www.rogerhalstead.com
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, R. Kevin Stover|
|Next by Date:||[TowerTalk] No problem tower and rotator, Jim Jones K0HY|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, Jim Lux|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day, Gary Schafer|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|