|To:||Jim Miller WB5OXQ <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] New FCC chariman needs to be a HAM!|
|From:||Fred Roberts <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:26:14 -0800|
It strikes me a more viable request would be that whomever is selected as FCC Chairman, it would most beneficial to everyone if he had a technical background and thus be better able to judge relative values of each proposed system.
73- Fred, W6TKV Riverside, CA
Jim Miller WB5OXQ wrote:
I wonder if there is any way many hams could write congressmen or representatives and insist that the new FCC chairman should be a ham. This would give him ad advantage in many ways and perhapps help protect our hobby. Having someone in that office that does not understand interfearance would render him less effective to all. WB5OXQ, Jim in Waco
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] "Wire"less antenna connection, Jim Lux|
|Next by Date:||RE: [TowerTalk] GFI Circuits, Jim Brown|
|Previous by Thread:||[TowerTalk] New FCC chariman needs to be a HAM!, Jim Miller WB5OXQ|
|Next by Thread:||RE : [TowerTalk] New FCC chariman needs to be a HAM!, hermans|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|