|To:||"David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>,"Towertalk Reflector" <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Bandpass filters - ICE vs Dunestar|
|From:||Jim Lux <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:08:37 -0800|
At 03:42 PM 1/31/2005, David Hachadorian wrote:|
In the ICE design, the signal path goes through 12 sets of relay contacts, 10 of which are normally closed. W7WW has complained about intermittent signal dropouts on receive, where he either has to physically smack the box, or transmit one DIT to break through what is apparently an insulating film on one of the normally closed relay contacts.
DO you mean that there are essentially 6 filters in series which are either in the circuit, or there's a shunt around it?
As opposed to having a (effective) 1P6T switch on each side of a bank of parallel filters? (The latter is what is typical in transceiver LPF sections)
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Rust Repair, W3YY|
|Next by Date:||RE: [TowerTalk] How to stiffen a mast, D. Scott MacKenzie|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Bandpass filters - ICE vs Dunestar, David Hachadorian|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Bandpass filters - ICE vs Dunestar, David Hachadorian|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|