Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] lightning & trees

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] lightning & trees
From: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Reply-to: kd4e@verizon.net
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:43:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I am no electrical engineer or physicist but this doesn't sound right.

The energy in lightning exists within the physical laws and would seem 
to be seeking a state of balance, and one expects would do so as 
efficiently as possible.

Would it not flow through the *best* path versus a lesser path should
both options present?

Why would lightning fail to follow a superior path versus a lesser
path?

Puzzled in lighting-alley Florida, doc

 > Gary Schafer wrote:
> Any tree or structure type in a given location has as good a chance as 
> the next to be hit. A grounded tower has about the same chance of being 
> hit as an ungrounded one. Conductivity of an object has little to do 
> with its chance of being hit by lightning.
> 73 Gary  K4FMX

-- 
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e

           |_|___|_|
           | | & | |
              {|
      /\      {|
     /  \     {|
    /    \    {|
   /   @  \   {|
   |   |~_|~~~~|
   |   -| |    |
============\ #    West Central Florida
     KD4E     ==============================
http://bibleseven.com/steelhouse1.html
Ham PC = 100% Linux Novell-Suse 9.2
Halli, Heathkit, Homebrew, MFJ, TenTec, Yaesu
Radio Life: http://www.gospelcom.net/twr/
Linux-Incompatible hardware is defective!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>