RFI in an LV system is not actually the problem here, Tom -- what I'm dealing
with is RF cross-talk between two TopTen 6-way relay boxes in an SO2R setup.
When I bring one 6-way physically close to the other (both apparently well
shielded) with 100 watts going through one into a dummy load, the receiver
going through the other to another dummy load shows well over S9. I have yet
to fully work through bonding, grounding, etc., but figured I should think of
coupling to the control lines as well, because the same proximity effect is
visible when I bring one 6-way near the control lines of the other.
I have some small ferrite beads from an HF choke balun kit, and can get 10-15
turns of wire through each - would this be an appropriate sort of choke to try
on the control leads?
73, Pete N4ZR
At 11:13 AM 8/16/2005, Tom Rauch wrote:
>used for 13 volts out to the relay box. The .1 caps were
>suggested by TopTen for best effectiveness at 160, but what
>I was really unsure of was the inductance of the RF chokes.
>I'll certainly have a look at your app notes.>>
>As for component values Pete, they all depend on the
>application. The voltage or current sensitivity of the
>device to RF, the waveshape change on control lines the
>device can tolerate before switching or component life
>becomes a problem, and so on. There is no real universal
>value of filter that works.
>You are significantly better off with an absorbing material
>like a ferrite with a very low Q at HF rather than
>inductors. The bypass caps mostly establish a low shunt
>impedance for the series impedance of the chokes to work
>against. In virtually all cases .01uF or .05uF caps would be
>more than adequate for 160 meters. A .01 is under 9 ohms on
>160 meters. Anything less than several ohms reactance is
>really just poor engineering. If it takes less reactance
>than five or ten ohms to prevent RFI in a LV circuit the
>system clearly needs some series impedance!
>It is very unlikely any value disk cap when the wire leads,
>ESR, and connection path in the equipment is included would
>have less than five ohms impedance from 1.8 to 30 MHz. Why
>pick a cap that might have .9 ohms reactance on 1.8 MHz only
>when perfect (no ESR) with zero lead length?
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
TowerTalk mailing list