Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please?
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:18:40 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Bring in dirt and build a mound at least 5 feet up from existing elevation.
Put the 27 foot tower on top.  Hopefully no one will notice and complain,
but if they do, at least you will be legal.  This will get you to .5wl so at
least one C-3 will have decent performance on 20M.

73, Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jesus Castro II
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:12 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please?

My dreams were crushed when I called the City Planning Office where Im going
to build a station and the man said the height limit was 27'. The future
site is a typical city lot.  It looks like I can no longer put up a stack of
C3's and a 2 el 40m.

I would like your thoughts on my best options to build the best station for
10-160 that's possible under these devistating peramiters.

Thanks all

Jesus - KC6PMT

_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>