On Jan 29, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Alan Wilson wrote:
> Ok guys, what is your opinion on which antenna is better overall. Of
> course the bazooka is more broadbanded, but does it have more gain?
The "broadbandedness" of the double bazooka probably comes more from
the additional loss of the coax than from any increase in the size of
the conductor. If you consider the size of 12 gauge wire or coax in
wavelengths for any HF band, the difference is minimal -- they are
both tiny fractions of a wavelength and virtually indistinguishable.
The bazooka, if anything, has fractionally less gain because of the
additional loss of the coax. Practically speaking, a dipole and a
double bazooka will perform the same. Considering the additional
cost, more complex construction and the mechanical weakness of the
bazooka, you're better off putting up a dipole.
> compared to a simple dipole centerfed with coax thru a balun...73,
> ps. Is the bazooka quieter?
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
TowerTalk mailing list