Thanks for the reply. Your point is one thing I am concerned
about. I have not done any excavating to probe the base yet. I was
thinking it looked awful small for a self supporter too.
The tower has been up about 20 years. I know that is not saying
much.
Thanks,
Justin
--
Justin S. Wilson <j2sw@mtin.net>
Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing
Web: http://www.mtin.net
Web: http://www.jwilson.ws
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Pat Barthelow wrote:
> Hello Justin,
>
> Don't have an answer, but a question. Is the small footprint triangular
> concrete pad that we see, the same area as the overall footing? Or does the
> base broaden out under ground? If that is a self supporting tower, which it
> appears to be, the base looks AWFUL small, and it might be wise to not model
> your new base as a copy of the old base.
>
> 73, DX, de Pat AA6EG aa6eg@hotmail.com;
> Skype: Sparky599
>
>> From: Justin Wilson <j2sw@mtin.net>
>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Identify this Tower?
>> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:22:33 -0500 (EST)
>
>> ANyone have an idea who might have made this tower? I am looking
>> for drawings, etc. to re-create the base.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> http://www.mtin.net/photos/wireless/tower1/tower1.htm
>
>> Justin S. Wilson <j2sw@mtin.net>
>> Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing
>> Web: http://www.mtin.net
>> Web: http://www.jwilson.ws
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|