Thanks for the reply. Your point is one thing I am concerned
about. I have not done any excavating to probe the base yet. I was
thinking it looked awful small for a self supporter too.
The tower has been up about 20 years. I know that is not saying
Justin S. Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Pat Barthelow wrote:
> Hello Justin,
> Don't have an answer, but a question. Is the small footprint triangular
> concrete pad that we see, the same area as the overall footing? Or does the
> base broaden out under ground? If that is a self supporting tower, which it
> appears to be, the base looks AWFUL small, and it might be wise to not model
> your new base as a copy of the old base.
> 73, DX, de Pat AA6EG email@example.com;
> Skype: Sparky599
>> From: Justin Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> To: email@example.com
>> Subject: [TowerTalk] Identify this Tower?
>> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:22:33 -0500 (EST)
>> ANyone have an idea who might have made this tower? I am looking
>> for drawings, etc. to re-create the base.
>> Justin S. Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing
>> Web: http://www.mtin.net
>> Web: http://www.jwilson.ws
TowerTalk mailing list