Ted,
I agree! Drainage of the elements, maximizing ice melt and ease of
maintenance would be my driving factors here in New Jersey.
Happy Thanksgiving & 73,
Gordon Beattie, W2TTT
201.314.6964
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ted Bryant
Sent: Thursday, 23 November, 2006 21:17
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Where does the element go?
If I remember my Statics & Dynamics correctly, the gravitational forces on a
horizontal element(and
the resulting torque on the boom) are the same whether it's mounted above or
below the boom. For a
symetrical element mounted at its center, rotational torque due to gravity
should very close to
zero.
I suspect the decision whether to mount the element above or below the boom
is affected more by
other factors.
73, Ted W4NZ
On 22 Nov 2006 at 19:42, Bill Turner wrote:
> Nearly all of the all-metal yagis I've seen have the elements mounted
> on top of the boom. I wonder why?
>
> If they were mounted under the boom, gravity would be working to keep
> the boom in place instead of constantly trying to turn the boom over.
> This is such a common design I'm wondering what am I missing?
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|