I would think that the difference would be similar for single monobanders on
each band vs. Steppir's.
Let's face it, the Steppir is a compromise antenna.
Bob W6TR
----- Original Message -----
From: "K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
To: <john@kk9a.com>; <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MonstIR vs Monobander
> As one would expect as mono bander's are optimized for boom length
> element spacing and Steppir's are a compromise for element spacing on
> the boom.
>
> But, then again Steppir's have many other advantages over mono banders
> for the guys who can't stack mono banders:)
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> I was just reading the 3830 results from last weekend's contest and I
> saw an
> interesting comment by 6Y1V / KY1V.
> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2007-03/msg00551.html
> The
> 6Y1V station has stacked SteppIR MonstIR antennas and on a separate
> tower
> stacked monobanders for 10m, 15m and 20m. The monobanders were 2 to 3 S
>
> units stronger than the SteppIRs.
>
> 73,
> John KK9A
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|