[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult

To: "Dick, W1KSZ" <>,"TowerTalk" <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Consult
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:20:46 -0400
List-post: <>
It basically depends on what you want to do, how much room you have and how 
good a shape you are in.

>I recently retired and am planning to re-locate to Tucson, AZ (from
> Lexington, MA). I am in the enviable position of rebuilding the shack
> and putting up a new antenna system.
> At present, I have narrowed the choice of towers to either 80' of
> Rohn 45 or an 80' Universal Aluminum Free-Standing tower.
> On top I am looking at a Tennadyne 8 or 10 el HF Log with a 6 Meter
> antenna above that (10' separation).

That's quite a wind load.

> The Rohn is the "classic" approach but the Universal is very inviting.
> First, no guys are required but it takes a lot more concrete in the base.
> Also, not sure how easy it would be for two guys to climb it to install
> the antennas.

The 45 G is very solid and roomy enough for two to easily work at the same 
OTOH I did all of the tower work solo (in my mid 60s), with one or two 
helpers on the ground to pull on the rope to the gin pole and move *stuff* 

For me it'd be more comfortable climbing the ROHN. I don't like going above 
the last  set of guys.

> The Rohn, while adequate, has it's drawbacks. Namely three sets of Guys
> and three more concrete piers.

That's what make it strong.
The self supporting is more "elegant" and less obtrusive. OTOH I'd not be 
comfortable putting what I have up on a self supporting tower.
Were I to do it again I'd probably go with a pair of crank up, self 
supporting towers.

Unfortunately a medical problem is currently keeping me from finishing up 
the work I had going, but I *hope* to be back at it in the not too distant 

> I would appreciate comments on my "predicament" and suggestions are
> welcome.


Roger (K8RI)

> Thanks,
> 73, Dick, W1KSZ


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>