Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical suggestions????

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>, TOWERTALK@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical suggestions????
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:58:11 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
At 11:51 AM 8/9/2007, Bill Turner wrote:
>After many years of using trap dipoles and individual switched dipoles
>I recently put up a set of three parallel-connected dipoles
>(160/80/40) and was very pleasantly surprised how easily they were to
>tune. I had always shied away from parallel dipoles because of stories
>about serious interaction between them, etc, etc. Not so. It was a
>piece of cake when using a MFJ-259 SWR analyzer.
>
>The point is, I would suggest parallel verticals, 1/4 wl on each band.
>Use one strong central pole for the lowest frequency and hang wires
>from it for the higher bands and spread the wires out a few degrees.


If you can make the pole not look like an antenna (maybe one of those 
ship's mast type flag poles with rigging) this is a good way to 
go.  You need to get the other wires seperated by a few inches to get 
good performance.

(And, as Bill says, something like a MFJ259 makes it straightforward 
to tune.. it's a nightmare without it..)


>I bet you will also be pleasantly surprised.
>
>Bill W6WRT
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>