[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand

To: "Tower Talk List" <>,"Jim Brown" <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand
From: "JoeCoolDXer" <>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 04:51:52 -0700
List-post: <>
If safety was really the issue, local governments would require permits to 
plant (and annual inspections) for *TREES*.
Falling trees cause far more injury and damage, than falling towers of the same 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Brown<> 
  To: Tower Talk List<> 
  Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 8:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand

  On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:26:30 -0500, bill rubin wrote:

  >The point I am making here is not the cost. Its that government is out of

  Far from it. Indeed, exactly the opposite. The building department quite 
  properly required that you provide engineered drawings showing that what you 
  proposed to install was safe. They would be out of control if they FAILED to 
  do that. And you DID get a deal. I've been a (sound system) design 
  consultant for 20 years. My current bill-out is $150/hr, and I won't sign 
  anything I haven't checked myself. I'm NOT a PE, but I am a professional. :) 


  Jim Brown K9YC


  TowerTalk mailing list<><>

TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>