|To:||Doug Renwick <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Incident Survey|
|From:||David Gilbert <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:47:04 -0700|
That seems awfully silly. Why would it take more than one instance to prove its value? There's already at least a few ex-hams who ended up permanently below ground solely because they DIDN'T have one (or didn't use one properly) that could have saved their lives, which seems a heck of a lot more relevant to me anyway.
But if you're that sold on free climbing a tower, have at it ...
Doug Renwick wrote:
Let's do a little survey amongst amateur (not professional) tower climbers on towertalk that climb with a full body harness and fall arrest lanyard.
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Falls, After the fall/save, Doug Renwick|
|Next by Date:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Falls, After the fall/save, Mike Fatchett W0MU|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Incident Survey, Roger (K8RI)|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Incident Survey, Mike Fatchett W0MU|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|