Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Collapsible Masts

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Collapsible Masts
From: "Chad WE9V" <chad.we9v@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:59:55 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
There's not much data there.  Anyone know more details, such as length
collapsed, can the sections nest for smaller bundle, size of that bundle and
weight?

Chad WE9V

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:52 AM, N7mal <n7mal@citlink.net> wrote:

> http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=33236&eventPage=2
>
> MAL
> N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.n7mal.com
> Everyone in the world is
> entitled to be burdened
> by my opinion
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Al Baker
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 15:42
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Collapsible Masts
>
>
> Fellow talkers,
>
> Please remind me the source of masts that collapse to say no more than 6-9
> feet lengths, suitable for inverted L support on dxpeditions.  Looking for
> one of about 45 feet when extended.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Al, W5IZ
>
>
>
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>