[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 55 anti climb

To: "Daron Wilson" <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 55 anti climb
From: "Bruce Jungwirth" <>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:42:04 -0500
List-post: <">>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daron Wilson" <>
To: "'Roger (K8RI)'" <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 55 anti climb

> Daron Wilson wrote:
>>> Anyone used the Rohn anti climb sheets on 55 or 45?  .....
  > I'm trying to head off the question from the electrical engineer when he 
> up to inspect this floating, un-bonded sheet metal around the base of the
> tower and asks why it isn't attached and bonded.
> Thanks,
> Daron N7HQR
> _
Since these plates are "ANTI CLIMB SHEETS', by definition they have no 
designed or functional electrical purpose. These are for SAFETY, to restrict 
climbing of the tower by unauthorized persons. Therefore any method of 
assembly should be OK as long as the tower is  completely covered on all 3 
sides the entire length of the sheets. The electrical engineer should not 
concern himself with non electrical safety issues. Now, your Liability 
Insurance carrier on the other hand, would be concerned with the 
installation, but only that all sides are covered, they are not easily 
removed, or if hinged, are equipped with a locking mechanism, and are 
determined that they do indeed restrict climbing. (personal Liability 

Good Luck
Bruce  K0SON
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>