[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] GAP voyager

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] GAP voyager
From: jim Jarvis <>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 17:56:00 -0400
List-post: <">>
I have significant first-hand experience with this antenna, having  
owned two, one of them
twice,  and having written the manual.

Careful comparison versus full sized antennas on 40, 30 and 20  
suggest that the voyager
is quite acceptable.   Any performance differences are more than  
swamped out by propagation
dynamics during switching.

It's actually a very effective antenna on 75/80, and like any OCF  
design, rather wide-banded.

Like its little brother, the challenger (?) (owned one of them, too,  
and have forgotten).. it doesn't
do well on the lowest band.

One of the reasons I bought back my last one is the notion of  
converting it to a simple 45' top loaded
vertical, fed against a radial field.   Switched matching networks  
would make it function multi-band.
GAP uses good materials, and this thing is quite robust.   The tuning  
rods would easily convert to
a gamma match system, possibly even one per band.


Jim Jarvis, President
Corporate Coach
The Morse Group, LLC
732 548 5573 office

Achieving Results in a Changing World


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] GAP voyager, jim Jarvis <=