I would be very reluctant to challenge a politically entity which allows a
given tower height by putting up that height of tower, as we understand the
meaning, with mast and antennas up higher. Why make them regret having a
basically permissive ordinance when they can outlaw ALL towers and make
amateurs have to fight to put up ANYthing? "Win the battle, lose the war"
comes to mind.
My $.02 worth.
73 to all,
> How is the ordinance worded? Park Township's (near Holland, MI -- but
> it's not the municipality in which I live) ordinance refers, I am told,
> to the height of the "tower." Thus some hams have argued that the mast
> they have protruding from the top of the tower doesn't count. I don't
> know whether that interpretation has ever been put to the test.
> Alan NV8A
> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list