[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] town ordanence

To: Martin Staffa <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] town ordanence
From: Richards <>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:35:03 -0400
List-post: <">>
Bravo...  now THAT sounds like perseverance deluxe.

Now....   look for the citation based on a vague and undefined
notion of what constitutes "wind storm" ...

(Sorry, I am a pessimist...)

============   Richards _ K8JHR ============

Martin Staffa wrote:
> In the town of NorthBranford Ct.They have a place for towers it is the 
> industrial zone!That was the first response from building dept. I tried in a 
> very nice way that I was not a cell tower site or industrial but a ham radio 
> operator and under a different set of rules and asked if they had a provision 
> for such.Blank Stare.OK lets try again back with paper work in hand health 
> district OK site planes tower specks measurement's case law on PRB-1 in 
> hand.No good hafta give it to town attorney towers  are in the industrial 
> zone! Months pass elections you know,then after the elections low and behold 
> paper comes back the town is required to give reasonable accommodation.Ok you 
> have to get a variance for height my god what next.Set the date hung the sign 
> the day comes get a call town clerk I am sorry can not get enough members to 
> show up Well I guess I get it then right? wrong set for next month. Finally 
> get the variance only to come up to town engineer, I am
>  sorry the tower does not meet speck for wind load up dated for 
> Ct.I gave him specs.on three different towers and then started asking about 
> provisions to that rule. Finally got the permit as long as promised to crank 
> it down during wind storms!I promised. Winston Churchill once said Never 
> Never Never give up good advice Martin N1KGP73s
> _______________________________________________


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>