I too have used the 203BA and it worked fine.
Michael Goinsm k5wmg
Professor, Writing
University of Texas at San Antonio
Please do not print this e-mail unless it is completely necessary
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com> wrote:
> Hello Tony!
>
> Back in the 70s and 80s I used two 203Bas. They worked great.
>
> Simple and straight forward. No problems.
>
> 73!
> Tim K3LR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k2vi
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 2:34 PM
> To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info
>
> Hello to all, I cannot seem to find much feedback on the 203ba. It seems to
> be a very unpopular antenna.The specs are there on the hy-gain page but a
> little ambiguous, The max wind rating is 80MPH. Would this be acceptable
> wind rating.It weighs 32# with a 16' boom.The M2 20m monobander with a
> whopping 34' boom weighs 35#.I would be inclined to think the M2 would blow
> apart in 80mph winds.Anyway if anyone has some experience with the hy gain
> 203 ba I would really apreciate your input. I can't even find a picture of
> this antenna anywhere on the net. 73s and god bless.
>
> tony K2VI
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|