| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] dx blaster antenna |
| From: | "Bill Aycock" <baycock@hughes.net> |
| Reply-to: | Bill Aycock <baycock@hughes.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:04:13 -0600 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
In all my reading about antennas in recent years, I have noted that every case of "Too good to be true" description has claimed that their particular antenna could not be modelled. See the history of the CFA for an exampe. I have seen the results of lots of poor madels, but not one from a competent modeller that did not give some indicatio of performance. Your experience may be different. Bill-W4BSG _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] dx blaster antenna, Steve Hunt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] dx blaster antenna, WA6RKN |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] dx blaster antenna, Gary Schafer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] dx blaster antenna, markrob |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |