Hi Folks!
There are only two stations using channel 6 after the June cutover.
Why are we not asking for a 4m band allocation, even with restrictions?
Does anyone know the process of petitioning the FCC?
In other countries there is a 70.0-70.5 allocation and while participation
is small, more countries have made allocations in the last decade and there
is activity.
Anyone want to collaborate on a petition?
Thanks & 73,
Gordon Beattie, W2TTT
201.314.6964
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of donmar1234@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 2:54 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] TV Channels 2-6 Post Transition
There are?20?Full Power TV stations listed for channels 2-6 post transition
and many Low Power TV stations. You can download the list from the FCC
here:? www.dtv.gov?? lower rhs of the page.
73,
Don
KW7R
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:37:34 -0400
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New TV antennas
To: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Cc: Tower Talk List <towertalk@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <4A0F240E.9080803@tm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 04:01:22 -0400, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>
>
>> Even here in Michigan we will have at least two active digital stations
>> on Ch 2. Nation wide I believe there will be on the order of 20-30.
>>
>
> That is not accurate. Most broadcasters are abondoning Ch 2-6 channels
>
That map is quite different from the FCC channel listing I looked at
about a month ago. Although they do have channel 2 showing up in the
Kalamazoo area.
There was a table showing present, or rather pre-change date channels
before they changed the date and the projected channels. That to was
quite different than what I have seen on the FCC page.
They also had a Saginaw station with is currently about 12 miles from
me, *currently* located in Badax which is way over in the thumb.
> because, during the first years of DTV, they learned that the impulse
noise
> in this frequency range seriously degrades DTV performance.
That used to be a problem but I doubt it is much of a one at present
except maybe in Chicago. The big problem is propagation which could be
a big problem with digital.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4080 (20090515) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4080 (20090515) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|