Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] lp V stepIR

To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] lp V stepIR
From: Scott McClements <kc2pih@gmail.com>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:56:08 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
So you are lengthening the boom length to 20 feet. I thought the
discussion was comparing a Tennadyne T8 to a 3 element Steppir. Does
the Tennadyne T8 use a parasitic director for 10 meters?  Sure, if we
just allows things to get "just a little bit longer" we can start to
get better performance from the LPDA. But the 3 element SteppIR  is
sitting on a 16 foot boom.   I wouldn't argue a T10 or T12 is closer
to the performance of the 3 element SteppIR, but that wasn't what was
originally stated.

-Scott, WU2X



On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Steve, W3AHL <w3ahl@att.net> wrote:
> Your model of the 8-element LPDA was apparently done from a formula and 
> wasn't optimized at all.  Although I do agree that 6 & 8 element logs are 
> sub-optimum.   But an optimized design for a 9 element 14-30 Mhz LPDA on a 
> 20' boom will average closer to 6.5 dBi with 17 dB F/B, except at 20m, where 
> it drops to 5.7 dBi & 11.3 F/B in free space.  Add a 10m director and you can 
> get 7+ gain with 30 dB F/B on 10M (with a 4' boom extension).
>
> And stacking an LPDA does have unique issues.  Anything that disturbs the 
> current phasing in the active-element  region will distort the pattern more 
> than with a standard yagi design.
>
> Steve, W3AHL
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>