Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: [TowerTalk] wind load

 To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." Re: [TowerTalk] wind load "Gene Smar" "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:47:12 -0500 mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 ```Dan: For a RIGID vertical element (such as an antenna mast or a heavy vertical made of thick-walled or solid tube), the force (say, 12.54 psf) would be applied midway up the element, or at 11 feet above the ground or tower top. (You can find the calculus for this in most introductory mechanics text books.) The area this force is applied over is the effective area of the mast or vertical antenna. So assuming an effective antenna area of 3.67 sqft (the actual shadow area of a 2 inch mast 22 feet long), the total force applied would be 12.54 X 3.67 = 46 pounds. The force would be handlied as a force at 11 feet AGL or above the tower top. We all must take this additional force and area of the mast into consideration when calculating the total wind force applied to the tower system. As for a real-world vertical that flexes in the wind, this will shed some of the wind loading leading to a reduction in total force applied to the vertical antenna. The actual number depends on how far the antenna bends in the wind. But by using the non-bending answer for a rigid tube you will be taking the conservative (safer) approach. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Schaaf" To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] wind load > How does this wind loading information apply to a bertical antenna which > is > rigidly mounted at the base and flexes in the wind? > In addition, if the vertical antenna is mounted on top of a 22 ft tower, > which is anchored in concrete, how does this info apply? > 22 ft tower is short in comparison and maybe can be considered non-movable > and then the vertical can be seen as the same as if it were mounted on the > ground. > > Dan Schaaf > K3ZXL > "In the Beginning there was Spark Gap" > www.k3zxl.com /towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ```
 Current Thread [TowerTalk] wind load, Charles Coldwell Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Rex Lint Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Tom Osborne Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Mike Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, jimlux Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Ken Kinyon Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Gene Smar Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Charles Coldwell Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Dan Schaaf Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Gene Smar <= Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Dan Schaaf Message not available Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Charles Coldwell Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, hanslg Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Stan Stockton Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, jimlux Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, yetiguy Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Hank Lonberg Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Mike Re: [TowerTalk] wind load, Pat Thurman