W5KI wrote:
> Dan,
>
> I concur with the other posters here, full-size elements, with some
> bends would be preferrable, in my opinion too. The variation of
> extending the two dipoles out as close to 90 deg perpendicular to each
> other is a good idea also,
There's a trade off when doing that. The farther you get the two apart
the more they operate as independent antennas. The closer you get them
the more they interact. There is a point where there is some
interaction that also adds bandwidth which I would think would be desirable.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> if space permitted. But the main point is
> that with the lot having 90 feet to use horizonally, before the 80m
> ends would hang down, would make an effective antenna.
>
> And without going into any antenna efficiency issues, the fact that
> using no coils/traps is: (1) less visible, more attractive and (2)
> less failure points in the future, both mechanically and from weather,
> ice, etc. are two good reasons to use full-size wire elements if at
> all possible. Good Luck.
>
> Steve, W5KI
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:43:56 -0700
>> From: Dan <n5ar@air-pipe.com>
>> Subject: [TowerTalk] 40/80m dipole
>> To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> Message-ID: <4BAACDEC.3080804@air-pipe.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> I would like to build and send to my son a coil loaded dipole for
>> 80/40m. He has about 90 feet space to hang it in. Has anyone
>> information
>> on loading coil values and placement in the 90 ft dipole?
>>
>> Tnx, Dan, N5AR
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|