[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Gap Challenger Comparison Testing Studies

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Gap Challenger Comparison Testing Studies
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:16:19 EDT
List-post: <">>
In a message dated 4/25/2010 8:38:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, writes:

>  Has anyone done a study? evaluating? the GAP CHallenger  DX,?against 
other verticals?
Butternuts, Hygain, CrushCraft, Steppir rtc..  

>  If so I would like to see the results as the peratin to  performance. I 
am not intersted in anecdotal evidence just fact. If any one  has performed 
testing I would like to hear from you. If there is enough?  response I will 
summarize and post the results. 
    Yessireebob. To quote from _www.championradio.com_ 
( , "Now you can  read an unbiased report on how 
they really 
performed. Antennas tested include  the Cushcraft R8, Butternut HF6V, MFJ 1798, 
Force 12 ZR-3 and V-3, Diamond  CP-6, Hustler 6BTV and Gap Titan. It's 64 
pages of protocol, data sets and  summaries. Presented at the Dayton 
    Not exactly the Challenger but full of lots of  actual data and 
observations. It's the only on-the-air HF vertical comparison  report in the 
Steve     K7LXC
Champion Radio Products
Cell: 206-890-4188


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>