Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> > In regard to Joe Subich remarks below, a reflector is designed to
> > SHARE information. Therefore a reply to originator setting in MY
> > opinion defeats the purpose of information sharing.
> A properly designed reflector will give the user the CHOICE of
> "Reply to sender" and "Reply to All" or "Reply to List." This
> software is so crippled by the moderator's configuration that
> it is nearly impossible to reply to sender without using "new"
> and looking up the poster's e-mail address.
TODAY the behavior when hitting REPLY seems to be the same as REPLY ALL
(gets sent to sender AND reflector). But REPLY ALL and then deleting the
unwanted destination has always worked for me.
TowerTalk mailing list