Yep, that'll work. Appears you've figured it out and
At 23:25 4/26/2010, you wrote:
>Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> > > In regard to Joe Subich remarks below, a reflector is designed to
> > > SHARE information. Therefore a reply to originator setting in MY
> > > opinion defeats the purpose of information sharing.
> > A properly designed reflector will give the user the CHOICE of
> > "Reply to sender" and "Reply to All" or "Reply to List." This
> > software is so crippled by the moderator's configuration that
> > it is nearly impossible to reply to sender without using "new"
> > and looking up the poster's e-mail address.
>TODAY the behavior when hitting REPLY seems to be the same as REPLY ALL
>(gets sent to sender AND reflector). But REPLY ALL and then deleting the
>unwanted destination has always worked for me.
>TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list