Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground

To: Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:10:10 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Mark Spencer wrote:
>> NEC cares about "don't burn down the building" and "don't
>> kill/injure the occupants".  Disasters like the MGM Grand hotel
>> fire and swimming pool shocks feature a lot in the discussions of
>> code makers when talking about Article 250.
> 
> 
> Don't burn down the building and don't kill / injure the occupants
> sound like a reasonable design criteria to me for the grounding of my
> amateur radio instalation.  The protection of my amateur radio gear
> takes a distant third place to protecting the lives of my family
> memebrs and our home.   Having a separate "RF ground" or antenna
> system ground that is not electrically connected to the electrical
> service ground by a dedicated ground wire would be a non starter for
> me.
> 

Yep..

But you don't need to connect the two with 4/0 welding cable or 3"
copper pipe, either.  As you say, "safety" is different than "equipment 
protection"
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>