Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating

 To: towertalk@contesting.com Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating Steve Hunt Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:26:06 +0000 mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 ```Paul, The coax used for comparison in the QST article was belden 8214; matched loss is quoted as 1.64dB/100m @ 10MHz. Belden say the cable is RG-8/U type. As I mentioned earlier, the ARRL assumptions about ladderline loss are very optimistic. It's easy to do a calculation based on the RF resistance of the gauge of wire used in ladderline to show that to get their loss figures the line would need to be constructed with something thicker than #12 gauge solid copper. If you take a more typical figure of #18 gauge you find the losses are *double* the ARRL figures. That leads to the mischievous thought that whoever did the ARRL calculations worked out the loss for one wire, but forgot that there are two wires making up the ladderline ;) The error is present in the Antenna Book and the associated software. Here's the simple maths based on the ARRL TLW figures for " 450-Ohm Window Ladder Line": Assumed wire size = #18 gauge Quoted Zo = 405 Ohms RF resistance of 100ft of #18 copper wire at 30MHz = 14.75 Ohms Assume 1A flows into the matched line. Then Pin = 405W, and the power lost in the line is 2*14.75 = 29.5W So line loss = 10*log (375.5/405) = 0.328dB Compare that with the ARRL TLW figure of 0.152dB/100ft at 30MHz 73, Steve G3TXQ On 01/12/2010 16:41, Paul Christensen wrote: > Steve, > > I just ran the numbers referred to by Owen, only I used RG-58 instead of > LMR-400: > > http://vk1od.net/transmissionline/VSWR/aldv.htm > > Since the QST author did not specify the coax type, the outcome for RG-58 is > closer to the mid-point of their respective results. Here's the loss I get > with RG-58: > > 40 ft of RG-58: 9.6 dB > 300 ft of Wireman 450 ohm windowed ladder line: 3.5 dB > > Difference: 6.1 dB > VK1OD's difference: 2.4 dB (I get the same result with LMR-400) > QST author's difference: 10.6 dB > > I suspect the author got that result from: (1) relying on the graph; (2) > using figures from low-loss non-windowed or tubular 450 ohm line where loss > is less; and (3) perhaps RG-58 was used for the QST comparison rather than a > low-loss coax type like LMR-400. > > Just for fun, I then ran the calculation with 300 ft of RG-58 for an > apples-to-apples comparison of line length for a long run. Total loss is a > whopping 19.1 dB. In fact, the return loss is so high, the VSWR at the > transmitter is 1.66:1. With that much loss, darn near anything you do to > the end of the line would probably keep the SWR under 2:1. With LMR-400, > 300 ft of loss is 13.5 dB versus 3.5 dB for somewhat lossy windowed line. > > Paul, W9AC > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hunt" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating > > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ```
 Current Thread Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Dan Zimmerman N3OX Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Steve Hunt <= Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, Steve Hunt [TowerTalk] Hygain acquisition?, Mat Eshpeter Re: [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating, jimlux