[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913F7 Vs. LMR-400UF : An Alternative. Input by

To: Tower Talk <>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913F7 Vs. LMR-400UF : An Alternative. Input by DAVIS RF Co
From: Stephen Davis <>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:20:14 -0500
List-post: <">>
Hello TT'rs,  

There has fairly often been comments on TT ref. the down side of outdoor use of 
Times LMR-400 UF.   The issue is short life.  As a cable design engineer, I 
have an appreciation for this problem. 

 The Times catalog/spec sheet indicates a life of up to 10 years.   The more 
realistic life range, in UV, IMHO and experience, is considerably less than 10 
years.  The reason for this is their use of TPE (Thermoplastic Elastomer) outer 
jacketing. It assists in good flexibility at a sacrifice to life due to UV 

  A not so well known, but excellent, alternative is Belden's 9913F7  (not to 
be confused with 9913, the often water in air (hollow) dielectric issue).
9913F7 uses their formulated PVC "Belflex" Tm which is good for 2 - 2.5 or more 
times the life of 400 UF.

  9913F7's  low loss is the same up to 2.8 GHz, and close above that.  The 
flexibility is the same.   The cost is about 8% less than 400 UF (BUT more like 
half the cost if you factor in how long 9913F7 will last). 

 This choice is almost a "no brainer".

I hope this is of some help to you.  If any questions, feel free to contact me.

73 and have some great Holidays,  

   Steve ,  K1PEK, 
DAVIS RF Co.,  Div. of Orion Wire Co., Inc.

Wire, Cable, RF Connectors and wire aerial parts.  

LMR, Heliax, Eupen

Commercial / Military

Custom Cable Design

tel:  978-369-1738     Fax:  978-369-3484


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>