----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Fuller" <email@example.com>
To: "K8RI on TT" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band dipoles
> Perhaps to the contrary Roger, The trapped antennas use somewhat less
> lossy L's and C's whereas the BBD's are more likely using R's. A
> horizontally deployed BBD might however be a little less noisey than a
> This thread is getting pretty thin.
> Gene / W2LU
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "K8RI on TT" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band dipoles
>> On 4/22/2011 12:39 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
>>> On 4/22/11 9:18 AM, Bill Aycock wrote:
>>>> You mention "actually tested" and "actually measured" in your post. Who
>>>> did this, how was it done, and where is it published? I have never
>>>> that these antennas were very good, and would like to hear any thing
>>> "good" can mean different things to different people.
>>> If you aren't concerned about efficiency (i.e. Tx Power vs Radiated
>>> power) then these are a convenient solution to wideband operation,
>>> installation in a variety of places, etc.
>> Probably not a great deal different than some trap verticals other than
>> radiation angle?
>> Roger (K8RI)
>> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list