On 4/25/2011 8:50 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> It doesn't matter. The Calif. Supreme Court let stand without hearing
> the appeal, the Palmdale ruling that a dinky VHF antenna is sufficient
> for the enjoyment of ham radio.
Which shows that like most of the public they are completely clueless
about technical issues.
> If that rolls on we're all screwed.
> I guess a ham can put up a dinky tower for his dinky VHF antenna
California pretty much has their own way of doing things. I believe the
CA supreme court which is the most liberal/left leaning in the country
has been over ruled more than any other.
By not ruling they do not set a higher court precedent.
The ham radio legal reflector would have much more accurate information
than we are going to get here.
TowerTalk mailing list