Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five
From: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:59:03 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
"That's because at frequencies above 14 MHZ, it makes a nice cloud warmer. 
The higher the
frequency, the warmer the clouds get."

Well, that depends on your definition of cloud burner.  The 43-foot vertical 
provides performance >= most commercial verticals up to about 15 meters. 
However, on 10 meters it is about 5dB down from a ¼-wave vertical at 10 
degree take off angle.  But the 43-footer has a higher radiation resistacne 
so ground losses are lower so this compensates some.  Here's a good analysis 
article:  http://www.eham.net/articles/21272.

Phil - AD5X

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] step ir vs zero five, Phil & Debbie Salas <=