Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Is Amphenol TWB 4001 equivalent to LMR-400?

To: Rich Hallman - N7TR <rich@n7tr.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is Amphenol TWB 4001 equivalent to LMR-400?
From: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 16:11:36 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Thank you, I hadn't found that particular reference.

73,
     David, K2DBK
     k2dbk.com
     k2dbk.blogspot.com


On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Rich Hallman - N7TR <rich@n7tr.com> wrote:

> Last page of the below link shows the cross-reference of the TWB-4001 to
> RF400...
>
> http://www.luxus.cz/dokumenty/new50ohm.pdf
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Kozinn,
> K2DBK
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:28 AM
> To: Tower Talk
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Is Amphenol TWB 4001 equivalent to LMR-400?
>
> A friend picked up some unused Amphenol TWB 4001 which his employer was
> discarding.  I've been trying to find out definitively if this is
> equivalent
> to LMR-400 electrically. I've found some data sheets for parts that seem
> to
> indicate that physically it can use the same connectors as 9913 or LMR
> 400,
> but I wanted to know if it's electrically similar. Can anyone help with
> this?
>
> 73,
>     David, K2DBK
>     k2dbk.com
>     k2dbk.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>