[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M

To: <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M
From: "Steve Jones" <>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:39:16 -0700
List-post: <">>
I have a 80M dipole up around 70 feet fed with open wire line just like 
yours.  I have worked a few countries with 100W feeding the shorted feedline 
through a tuner.  I have no counterpoise or radial system so sometimes I 
have trouble with RF in the shack.  I worked 3Y0X on Peter I with this setup 
a few years ago.  The 8,000 mile path was pretty much all over water, but 
this shows what is possible with a shorted open wire feeder and 100W on 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Brown" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M

> On 6/4/2011 12:37 PM, jsloss wrote:
>> What type of 160m performance, if any, am I likely to get if I tie the 
>> shack end of open wire feeders together, that go to a 80m dipole up 55', 
>> and feed it against ground.
> You're very likely to have a lot of fun on 160M.  I've used EXACTLY that
> antenna, with great success both here in Nor Cal and back in Chicago.
> One important caveat though -- you don't want to feed it against the
> EARTH, you want to feed it against some sort of counterpoise that acts
> as the other half of the antenna, like radials, whatever wire you can
> string out, etc.  Back in Chicago I used a big wrought iron fence that
> ran around the front of my city lot. Here in Nor Cal I had room for
> radials, so that's what I used. My buddy, KK9H, uses the HVAC ducts in
> his wood frame suburban house. He ain't loud, but we've worked several
> times from Nor Cal to Chicago.
> Note that having fun on 160M also means a good RX antenna. Study the
> literature for various RX loops and Beverages. The ON4UN book and the
> ARRL Antenna Book.
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>