Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic
From: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:25:10 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tim,
I had to go check my filters. My transmit set are #004 and my receive set of
filters are #10.

Oh and at V26B a number of years ago we were using two different brands of
filters. I brought down my set of 'NQN receive filters, just in case. The
160M op was complaining about 80M nailing 160M. He swapped out the other
filters for the 'NQN and his problem went away. 

CU in the ST0S pileups.

73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Duffy K3LR [mailto:k3lr@k3lr.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 1:26 PM
To: 'N2TK, Tony'; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic

I agree Tony

In the late 80s when I was building my station - I had ICE single band -
bandpass low power filters for all bands. They were installed between the
radio and the amplifier. 

It wasn't long after we started using this set up that one of the 10 meter
filters failed. Same issue as reported here. The capacitor value had
changed. I recall measuring the performance of the ICE filters with a HP
network analyzer and I was disappointed. I knew the performance and
reliability could be better.

I called W7ZOI and W3NQN on the phone back then to get their thoughts about
single band low power bandpass filters. That was the start of W3NQN
designing the bandpass filters that many of us use in our stations today. Ed
wrote several QST articles and has helped countless guys with his filter
designs. W3NQN filters are now sold through Bob and Jay at Array Solutions
and used all over the world

I have serial number 001 and 002 W3NQN low power bandpass filters for each
of the HF contest bands - still in use at K3LR. There have been no W3NQN
filter failures after 450,000 QSOs. The excellent measured bandpass through
loss and band reject performance are the same as they were when Ed built
them for me - over 20 years ago.

73,
Tim K3LR

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:55 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic

Someone gave me a tip a number of years ago about checking out 419 filters.
He said to take off the cover and stick your nose in the box and see if you
have a burnt smell. And look at the color of the caps and see if some are
quite dark in color from excessive current.

Now use W3NQN transmit and receive filters. Overall seem to work much
better.

73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K1TTT
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:15 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic

Again, its probably not the voltage but the current that is the problem...
See my last message.  

Also on mine the capacitors on 20m hadn't 'failed' they had shifted value...
It was obvious to see using a minivna to sweep the filter that it was still
there, it just wasn't resonating where it what supposed to any more.  In
mine the 10m section had one of the shunt caps shorted, the others were ok,
but I replaced them all anyway.  The 20m section had one of the shunt caps
changed from 1000pf to 247pf on a handheld dmm, my mfj 269 reads it as 614pf
at 2mhz but is highly frequency dependent where the good one is a stable
1040pf or so over a wide range.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Ketchell [mailto:k5er@arrl.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 21:48
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic
> 
> 
> Okay, I'll ask too...
> 
> The 20 meter section of my ICE 419b failed - infinite SWR.
> 
> I removed cover from relay and polished contacts, eliminating 
> it as the 
> possible failure point.
> 
> Inductors - still same size and shape, can't be them.
> 
> Pulled the 3 caps and took to elec supply store. All 3 
> checked good on 
> their tester (had them check twice). Took to friend with HP 
> meter. The two 
> shunt caps (.001 @ 2kv) each checked fine - the 270 pf (+/- 
> 5%) checked as 
> 251 pf - about 7% off. Would have thought it was close enough 
> to find a 
> resonate point, but it would not.
> 
> I simply replaced all three and it works just like new.
> 
> Why would the caps check as okay, but be absolutely worthless in the 
> circuit?  IF it is the series cap (270pf at 1kv) that fails, then why 
> doesn't it ever seem to take the .05 @ 200v series cap right 
> at the antenna 
> port? If not the series cap, how does a 100 watt radio 
> generate enough 
> voltage to cause a 2kv cap to fail? There are resonate auto-switched 
> antenna on each band, so it "shouldn't" see high SWR.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> 
> ...
> >What usually happens when the filter fails is that one or both of
> >the capacitors on the radio side of the Pi changes value.
> >
> >Mouser has a good selection of heavier-duty replacement caps.
> >For example, Mouser part number 5983-19-1KV330 for 15 meters.
> >Even with those, the filter can still fail.
> >
> >Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> >Big Bear Lake, CA
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: James C. Hall, MD
> >Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 2:28 PM
> >To: towertalk@contesting.com
> >Cc: tcg1@googlegroups.com
> >Subject: [TowerTalk] ICE 419B schematic
> >
> >Hello:
> >
> >I sent an email to ICE inquiring about their ability to repair my
> >ICE 419B's
> >which have a couple blown filters. I got a response that since
> >Mike died,
> >they can't repair anything right now.
> >
> >I asked about a schematic of these 2-stage filters and they came
> >back with
> >'they don't have them either', which I found rather strange. At
> >any rate,
> >does anyone have a schematic or parts list of the 419B so that I
> >may attempt
> >to fix them myself ?
> >
> >This may or may not be the correct forum to send this, so if not,
> >please
> >advise and I'll redirect this.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >73, Jamie
> >
> >WB4YDL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>