Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical

 To: "Al Kozakiewicz" , Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical "Paul Christensen" Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:38:20 -0500 mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 ```> "Adding a matching circuit at the transmitter (tuner) or adjusting the > length of the feedline such that a 50 ohm resistive impedence is presented > to the source does not change the VSWR in the feedline. Yes, the VSWR > between the source and the tuner will be 1:1, but the VSWR in the feedline > will remain unchanged." Sometimes VSWR does change significantly along a line -- and not always for reasons of loss nor common-mode RF current on the outside of a coaxial line. Consider this example: At the operating frequency, a dipole at its input terminals is exactly 50 ohms resistive (50+j0). Let's feed the dipole with an electrical half-wave of low-loss 600-ohm open line. VSWR on the line is 12:1. Correct? Finally, let's connect a random length of 50 ohm, low-loss coax to the input of the 600 ohm line. What is the VSWR on the 50 ohm section of line? Possible Answers: A. Is it still about 12:1 because VSWR does not change on a low-loss line. B. Not enough information because you didn't state the coax length. C It's now about 6:1 D. It is now 1:1 E. You can't terminate a coaxial line into a 600-ohm balanced line without a current balun and get an answer. F. None of the above. Bonus question: What is the impedance at the input to the 600-ohm line section? So, here we have one transmission line composed of two types. Ignoring loss, is the VSWR really the same at all points on the transmission line? Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ```
 Current Thread Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, (continued) Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, TexasRF Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, TexasRF Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Ken Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Al Kozakiewicz Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, K8RI Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Al Kozakiewicz Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Hank Garretson Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Paul Christensen <= Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Ken Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Al Kozakiewicz Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Jim Lux Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, john Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, TexasRF Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Mike Ryan Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Tom Osborne Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, john Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated vertical, Jim Brown