Thanks for your help.
I talked about the filter, because this is the motive of why I added a
little more coaxial.
But then I removed the filter and added just the 8.35ft jumper to the
antenna (without the filter in the middle).
So I have the coax that came from the antenna and I measured SWR, then added
8.35ft to this coax and the SWR measurements are different.
Next weekend will measure with an antenna analyzer, just the coax that came
from the antenna to the AIM4170, then will add the 8.35ft and will measure
again. Hope this give a good idea about what´s wrong. Hopefully is not the
antenna, and if I replace the balun and coaxial hopefully all will be OK
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] En nombre de Jim Brown
Enviado el: Sábado, 31 de Diciembre de 2011 04:46 p.m.
Asunto: Re: [TowerTalk] M2 20M5 SWR measurements
On 12/31/2011 6:41 AM, Jorge Diez CX6VM wrote:
> I have a 20M5 and 15M6 antennas from M2
> After 3 years using this antennas, I noticed a change in the SWR of the
> when I added a High power BPF, for what I need to add some coaxial
I suggest that you look at the SWR for the new filters into a 50 ohm
dummy load, and also carefully measure the loss through the filter. The
filter could be responsible for some of what you're seeing. ANY filter
can add some phase shift and mismatch. A good one should add much less.
Look inside the filter -- is there coax from each connector to the first
circuit elements, or are they depending on the chassis to carry the
signal return? Using the chassis as a return adds stray inductance to
the signal path, which means unintended phase shift, can degrade the
performance of the filter, and increases SWR. There's also the question
of whether the filter was properly tuned during final test. An
inductive or capacitive component that is out of tolerance can degrade
the filter response and increase the SWR. Some filter builders do
serious alignment during final test, but some do not. Nearly all the
filters I bought from ICE came to me out of alignment, and none of them
used coax inside the filter to minimize stray inductance
There's also the matter of how the small impedance mismatch of your
antenna looks after it is transformed by the length of the feedline. NO
antenna is a perfect match, and filters are designed to be connected to
a pure 50 ohm load, and that's how they are tested. But if the load on
the filter is not exactly 50 ohms, the response of the filter will be
different, and so will the impedance at the input of the filter. What
the feedline does will random depending on its length, its loss, the
frequency, and what the impedance is at the antenna (not exactly 50
ohms, with some added XL or XC. This means that the feedline at the TX
end will not be exactly 50 ohms, and there will be some added XL or XC.
The filter will transform that impedance, and the filter can either
cancel some of the XL or XC, or it can add to it; it can add to the R
component (most likely) or it can reduce it.
As for your test with only the jumper added to your long coax run --
what are you using to splice those cables together? Is it an Amphenol
barrel connector, or is it a no-name product? No-name connectors are
well known to be cheap junk, and could cause that mismatch. Bad
installation of the connectors on each of the coax cables, both the main
long run and the jumper could cause a problem like this. Are they
soldered or crimped? Are you sure that the shield connection is very
very solid for each connector?
73, Jim K9YC
TowerTalk mailing list
Se certifico que el correo no contiene virus.
Comprobada por AVG - www.avg.es
Version: 2012.0.1901 / Base de datos de virus: 2109/4714 - Fecha de la
TowerTalk mailing list