[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Andrews Heliax Conx

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Andrews Heliax Conx
From: "" <>
Reply-to: "" <>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:48:44 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
List-post: <">>
I'm considering putting up a crank-up tower. What's the best recommended 
low-loss feedline for an antenna mounted on a tall crankup tower? I know that 
unfortunately you can't use heliax on a crankup, due to it wanting to kink 
(except maybe from the ham shack to the top of the lowest non-moving section of 
the tower, probably about 20 feet above ground.) From there, what do people 
using things like the tall HDX-5106 towers use, to try to get a balance between 
feedline strength and low loss? That length alone could easily be about 100 
feet of feedline, if you have an antenna on the upper part of a tall mast, and 
the length needed to get to the driven element.


-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Miller <>
>Sent: Feb 12, 2012 5:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Andrews Heliax Conx
>I'm just in the planning stages and not ready to buy yet. Perhaps I should
>just let the Commscope/Andrew dust settle. Their website is a bit of a mess.
>Anyone know if the AVAS line is replacing the heliax line?
>Which line of connectors is the likely survivor?
>jim ab3cv
>TowerTalk mailing list


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>