Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna

 To: "Gary Slagel" , Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna "Paul Christensen" Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:18:01 -0500 mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 ```Gary, I imported the same model into 4Nec2 and scaled the frequency to 7.0 MHz. Feedpoint Z is 4.6-j17.7. Your Z values look quite extreme (also see notes below about feed Z for the 8JK). Using Zo=450-ohm line, two points result in minimum SWR(50) at the line input. The first occurs at 65 ft where SWR(50) is 7:1 and a total loss of 1.8 dB. The second point will occur a half-wave more at 130 ft. where SWR(50) is 5:1 and total loss is 3.0dB. VSWR is lower, but it's the result of additional loss due to SWR. So, loss is higher, but SWR is lower due to added loss. Me, I would add an L network at the feedpoint. First, look at transforming the low feedpoint Z to 450+j0. What L network values? A high-pass can be made with 800 pF C in series at the feed, followed by a shunt of 1 uH of L. L would be a small turn or hair-pin of wire. That combination results in a perfect match from 4.6-j17.7 into 450+j0. Total L network loss is only 0.23 dB with reasonable component Q. Finally, let's see what 150 feet of loss is with the L in place. Well, SWR(450) is 1:1, and line loss is now only 0.1 dB but SWR(50) is 9:1 at the line input. So, a tuner must be used between the Tx and line input. How about a deliberate mismatch at the feedpoint to some intermediate Z value to allow for line length trimming? We can still use an L network, but now convert 4.6-j17.7 into 50+j0. That's 0.37 uH across the feed, followed by 700 pF of series C. At 127 feet of line, SWR(50) is now 1.1:1 and line loss is respectable at 0.4 dB (+0.23 dB of network loss = 0.63 dB total) and -- no tuner required! FYI - Here's the comment section for the 4Nec2 file concerning the 8JK: "Originally designed by John Kraus, W8JK in about 1940, this antenna has some interesting properties. It by two closely spaced elements driven out of phase. Although the fields from the elements don in any direction, gain is nonetheless achieved because of lowering of the radiation resistance due to mutual coupling. And lower it is -- note the feedpoint impedance of only 4.74 - j19 ohms. Compare this to a single element. The lower resistance results in heavier current, hence greater field strength, for a given power input. The difficulty is that system losses can quickly eat up the gain. Making this antenna from #12 copper wire (try it -- and include wire loss) drops the gain about 0.65 dB, not too bad. But great attention must be paid to losses in matching networks. And losses rapidly increase in significance as the spacing is made closer than the 0.1 wavelength of the example. When mounted low (0.25 wavelength for the example), W8JK-type antennas have a lower radiation angle than many other horizontal antennas due to the inherent lack of high-angle radiation. As an interesting exercise, save the pattern for later comparison. Then delete the second source, making the antenna into a Yagi. Note the increased gain. Even though the "takeoff angle" is higher, the Yagi gain is as good or better even at lower angles. In addition, the feedpoint impedance has increased to a much more manageable value. On the other hand, the W8JK will retain its performance over a much greater frequency range than the Yagi." Paul, W9AC ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Slagel To: Paul Christensen ; TowerTalk Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna Thanks Paul, I've attached the Source Data output below. This, I believe, is showing me SWR and impedance at the feedpoint of each element. I'm not sure if EZNEC gives me a way to see the SWR at the single feedpoint that I'll use to feed these two feedpoints but I assume it will be equally as bad. I'm using the standard ARRL W8JK model that comes with the demo version of EZNEC in the ARRL antenna book. I modify that model to look like what I want to build and as long as I don't save it the software performs like the full version of EZNEC. I'm over my head with antenna modeling as soon as I move past modeling a dipole but I forge ahead and try and get as much useful information as I can from it. The question still is, if I get the antenna working properly how much loss will I see on the feedline. Thanks much for your help. EZNEC ARRL ver. 4.0 2/28/2012 7:53:59 AM --------------- SOURCE DATA --------------- Frequency = 7.05 MHz Source 1 Voltage = 397.6 V. at -89.63 deg. Current = 1 A. at 0.0 deg. Impedance = 2.597 - J 397.6 ohms Power = 2.597 watts SWR (50 ohm system) > 100 (75 ohm system) > 100 Source 2 Voltage = 397.6 V. at 90.37 deg. Current = 1 A. at 180.0 deg. Impedance = 2.597 - J 397.6 ohms Power = 2.597 watts SWR (50 ohm system) > 100 (75 ohm system) > 100 Total applied power = 5.193 watts Gary Slagel KT0A From: Paul Christensen To: Gary Slagel ; TowerTalk Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna > "I think I can tune the antenna with the feedline and get it down to a more reasonable level, maybe 10 to 1, at the tuner end. Then the tuner will tune it to resonance so the xmttr can put its full load into. > Question is, since the swr is 10 to 1 at the radio end of the feedline but 100 to 1 at the antenna end of the feedline, am I going to see the 3.5 db loss from a 100 to 1 swr or the .5 dbi that a 10 to 1 swr would give me." Gary, you can vary the impedance at the input end of the line, but not the SWR. The SWR on the 450-ohm section will remain nearly constant over your 150 ft run, even with length trimming. In EZNEC, what is the Z of the antenna you're modeling at the operating frequency in an R+j format? Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ```
 Current Thread [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Gary Slagel Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Gary Slagel Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Peter Voelpel Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Paul Christensen <= Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, David Gilbert Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, David Gilbert Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] balanced line loss on a mismatched antenna, Steve London