[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Coax

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax
From: K8RI <>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:56:22 -0400
List-post: <">>
On 4/9/2012 7:46 PM, Larry Burke wrote:
> Roger, K8RI, wrote....
>> No one wanted the LMR-400UF either.  All they had to do was cut open a
> section to find water damage and it didn't get in at the connectors either.
> We cut open one piece and found about 5 or 6 feet mostly white powder in the
> middle.
> Is anyone else having problems with the longevity of the UF-type cables? I
> just built an antenna that has a short run of it but it is run under a
> square boom most of the way... out of direct sunlight and direct rain. It is
> not in a rotor loop and will not be flexed (but needed the flexibility in
> the original construction).

If it's protected I'd guess it'd do quite well, but that is a guess. As 
a preference though, I'd pick the Davis BuryFlex and no, I have no 
connection with the company, but have found them to be very helpful.

The UF is very flexible and has a tight repeatable bend radius.
Actually the standard LMR-400 has a very small minimum bend radius (1") 
although the repeatable, minimum bed radius is quite a bit larger (4"), 
I'd not want to use that for a rotator loop.

The flat top plate on a 45G is large enough to put a 3 turn, or possibly 
2 turn coil of standard LMR-400 for a rotator loop (16" or 18" in 
diameter), but when it comes to rotator loops my preference is Davis 
BuryFlex(TM) because of the very tough and slippery jacket.


Roger (K8RI)


TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>