[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] original source of "avoid sharp bends" in lightning

To: Grant Saviers <>, towertalk <>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] original source of "avoid sharp bends" in lightning
From: Jim Lux <>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:31:53 -0700
List-post: <">>
On 4/11/12 10:33 PM, Grant Saviers wrote:
> might be as simple as:
> "Don't do anything that increases the inductance of the grounding wire" ?

the original source might say that, but it's not actually true.  Until 
you get a full 360 loop, the inductance of a bend isn't much more than 
the inductance of the length of wire in the bend.

if you think about it, the increase in inductance in a loop is because 
the magnetic field from one part of the wire interacts with the field 
from another.  Two pieces of wire at right angles don't couple very 
well, parallel pieces do.  A 360 loop has coupling "across" the loop, 
but with an incomplete loop, much of the loop doesn't couple to anything 

In any case, that's why I'm looking for the original source.  I suspect 
that it's either:

1) how things were wired back in Ben Franklin's time, and it's carried 
on to this day because it doesn't hurt, even if it doesn't help, either. 
  (the corollary, it takes more time to explain why not than to just do it)

2) A sharp bend produces a place where flashover/breakdown is more 
likely to occur.

I discovered a few weeks ago that a bunch of the grounding conductor 
guidelines in power substations (something that amateur radio folks are 
unlikely to have to worry about) were based on the behavior of bolts and 
materials commonly used at the turn of the last century.  So that got me 

(that, and Ward's article about 468)

TowerTalk mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>