Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation

 Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation Steve Hunt Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:07:31 +0100 mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 ```Jim, Let me try to explain it more simply. Picture Roy Lewallen's "classic" diagram showing how the differential-mode current flowing on the inside of the coax braid splits two ways at the feedpoint - some flowing into the dipole leg and some flowing the CM path back along the outside of the coax braid. Suppose: Iant is the current flowing into the dipole leg Icm is the current flowing along the CM path Zant is the impedance looking into the dipole leg Zcm is the impedance looking into the CM path. We know that the current will split in inverse proportion to the two impedances, so: Icm / Iant = Zant / Zcm or, rearranging: Icm = Iant * Zant / Zcm If Zant changes, thereby changing the SWR, then Icm will also change and so will the choke dissipation. If the SWR is caused by a drop in Zant, the choke dissipation will decrease; if it's caused by an increase in Zant, the choke dissipation will increase. Either way it's quite wrong to say: "SWR has NOTHING to do with dissipation in a common mode choke." In a practical example like an HF wire dipole, you'll see that the increasing SWR as you move away from the resonant frequency results from an _increase_ of antenna impedance because the reactance changes at a faster rate than the resistance; a choke designer would be wise to allow for the extra dissipation that causes. Finally, if you don't believe my analysis, just try modelling the situation in EZNEC. I took an 80m dipole (#14 wire at 35ft) and added a 4k resistive choke to the CM path at the feedpoint. For 1000W applied power these were the choke dissipations at various frequencies: SWR=1.4:1 at resonance: 2.2W SWR=2:1 below resonance: 3.3W SWR=2:1 above resonance: 3.9W SWR=3:1 below resonance: 5.2W SWR=3:1 above resonance: 6.4W As you can see, the SWR directly affects the choke dissipation! 73, Steve G3TXQ On 19/04/2012 05:47, Jim Brown wrote: > On 4/18/2012 12:16 PM, Steve Hunt wrote: >> Sorry to disagree again, but the CM choke dissipation DOES also depend >> on the SWR! > I don't buy your analysis, but I don't have time to pick it apart. :) > > 73, Jim K9YC > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > TowerTalk mailing list > TowerTalk@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk > > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk ```
 Current Thread Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, (continued) Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Thomson Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt <= Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Brown Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, K1TTT Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Steve Hunt Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, K1TTT Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Paul Christensen Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Tod Olson Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation, Jim Lux