Think of it this way Pete -- why waste bandwidth sending graphics to the
entire list and risk malware distribution when for a given topic perhaps
less than 10% would have interest in a particular thread. Best to post the
graphics to a web site where those interested can click on the link to
gather more details and visuals. This is the way its done on other list
services. Less risk, less bandwidth usage...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 8:46 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Attachments was: Re: The Antenna System
> The blocking of attachments such as graphics with messages was
> originally based on concern that they might be vehicles for viruses, as
> well as the bandwidth implications of large attachments. The impact of
> distributing a virus simultaneously to several thousand users was too
> horrific to contemplate.
> I notice now that almost all attempts to distribute malware that I
> receive are using links to trap the unwary. Whether or not it would be
> safe to allow attachments is a question I leave to the security experts.
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> On 4/21/2012 11:45 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote:
>> I concur 100%
>> In the engineering fields we are accustomed to communicating with a
>> description and a drawing showing the details.
>> There should not be any guess work or trying to visualize the design.
>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
>>> On 4/21/12 8:12 AM, Ward Silver wrote:
>>>> I'm really enjoying the multiple threads and discussions that started
>>>> with baluns and have come around to an analysis of the entire antenna
>>>> That changing just one element of the entire system in isolation is
>>>> unrealistic is a key point that most hams do not appreciate - indeed,
>>>> they rarely hear that point of view. They learn about antennas as one
>>>> independent thing, feed lines are another thing, baluns a third thing,
>>>> and so forth. Thus, they tend to analyze and troubleshoot and modify
>>>> assuming changes "here" don't affect behavior "there". Since changing
>>>> almost any part of the system affects the entire system, the results
>>>> are wildly inconsistent and often mystifying - as noted by Ian and
>>>> others. At any rate, the discussions have provided numerous examples
>>>> to use in explaining antenna system behavior to our clubs and fellow
>>>> hams (and in my case, readers) - thanks.
>>>> Also, it would greatly facilitate the discussion were we to be able to
>>>> include drawings - I noticed several misunderstandings that would not
>>>> have occured if the text was accompanied by graphics. I can tell that
>>>> many writing hours have been consumed trying to write clearly in a pure
>>>> text environment!
>>> picture, 1000 words, and all that..
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list