PS, I have pictures of the tower online at
On 05/06/2012 01:19 PM, Bruce Ward wrote:
> Has anyone used Rohn 25 section(s) instead of a boom pole on top of a
> larger tower?
> I have a Tri-EX HZN 471 that the previous owner configured to lift to
> 66' instead of the factory 71'. He also used a 2" diameter boom pole
> extending about 18' above the top of the tower with a large antenna on
> top of that.
> I have erected the tower and discovered it would be better if I could
> obtain some additional height. I am placing around 3 square feet of
> antenna load on the tower.
> I am considering the possibility of removing the top bearing, installing
> a Rohn 25 base plate then installing 3 sections of Rohn 25. I would
> also add a second set of guys at the top of the Tri-EX and secure the
> retractable sections to each other to limit rocking between them.
> I believe the wind load produced by the Rohn 25 would be similar to that
> of the 2" boom pole and that my total wind load would be far less than
> had been placed on the tower for the last 35 years. By securing
> (clamping) the retractable sections and adding an additional set of guys
> I believe the tower would be much stronger than the original design.
> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list